• Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 23 other followers

  • December 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Recent Comments

    URL on Obama’s Lawyers Officially Adm…
    FBI Rewrites Federal… on FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Le…
    The Grey Enigma on FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Le…
    The Grey Enigma on FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Le…
    vernon on the deportation of Obama
  • Categories

  • Blog Stats

    • 3,398 hits
  • Blogs I Follow

MISSING FEDERAL EXPRESS PACKAGE DELIVERED TO THE SUPREME COURT

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=364381

 

Dear Mr. Sutter and Mr. Fossum,

I am in receipt of a December 3, 2012 letter from Chief Clerk William Sutter drafted and signed by Eric Fossum in regards to denial of Plaintiff’s First Amendment right for Redress of Grievances, which was exhibited twice by the clerk’s office’s wrongful denial of Plaintiff’s right to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304.

In aforementioned letter from you Mr. Fossum provided incorrect information, specifically he stated that there was no order from the clerk’s office denying the “right by Petitioner to file a petition for a writ of certiorari” and that there was no attempt to file a writ of certiorari by the Plaintiff. Exhibit 1 December 3 letter from Clerk Sutter signed by Eric Fossum

1. Please, see attached two Federal Express receipts:

a. Exhibit 2. Federal Express Receipt showing a package delivered to SCOTUS on October 2, 2012 9:12 am signed by J Kouros.

b. Exhibit 3 Federal Express receipt showing a second package sent to  SCOTUS on October 7, 2012 and delivered to SCOTUS on October 9, 2012  9:52 am and signed by D. Gamble.

2. On December 6, 2012 around 10:45 am plaintiff Taitz called SCOTUS and demanded to talk to Chief Clerk Sutter in regards to her grievance of wrongful denial of her right for redress of grievances. Assistant for Chief Clerk Sutter stated that he is not available and advised Taitz to talk to a different case analyst, Mr. Traves. Mr. Traves reviewed the computer file of the case and stated that he can see on his internal docket  documents filed on October 1, received on October 2, 2012, he can see and can read a letter from Chief Clerk Sutter, which incorrectly stated that Plaintiff is out of time to file a Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Plaintiff was actually over a month early as the final decision was on August 8 and she had 90 days until November 7, 2012), however analyst Traves could not see on the electronic docket a  package  received by the court on October 9, 2012 and signed by D. Gamble.

It appears that there is nefarious activity in the court and someone threw the package away and either never docketed that package or deleted a docket entry made earlier.

 

////////////////////////////////

Read the rest at the above link

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Natural Born Citizen

Respecting the Constitution?

drkatesview

Thoughts on Our Constitutional Republic

Friends of Citizen Wells

A place for discussion of just about anything.

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

WordPress.com

WordPress.com is the best place for your personal blog or business site.

%d bloggers like this: